Read-only. No wallet connection. Rankings are discovery signals, not investment advice.
Example Token EXM
Base · 0x1234…abcd · Sample
Confidence 85% · attention-v1
Attention
73
Context flags
! Concentrated holders! Source not verifiedVolume +240%
SCANNING · SAMPLE
Volume +240%Wallets +86%Liquidity lowSource not verifiedHolder count unknownTop holders concentratedData stale · 3hScore attention-v1Sample dataVolume +240%Wallets +86%Liquidity lowSource not verifiedHolder count unknownTop holders concentratedData stale · 3hScore attention-v1Sample data
What it answers
Three questions. In this order.
Meme-token discovery is noisy. NarraScan compresses the first pass of research into a report you can check.
01
What is receiving unusual attention?
A ranked feed of candidates, each identified by chain and contract address, never by symbol alone.
02
What measurable activity explains it?
Volume, transactions, wallets and holders against a defined window, with raw values kept.
03
What should I check before trusting it?
Liquidity against volume
Holder concentration
Contract controls
What is missing or stale
How it works
Deterministic first. Words second.
01 · SCAN
Pull public data.
One supported chain, read through swappable provider adapters. Raw values are stored before anything is derived.
02 · SCORE
Rank the attention.
Six measured features are normalized to 0 to 100 and combined. The score version is stored with every result.
03 · EXPLAIN
Say what changed.
The explanation comes from structured findings only. It names the drivers and what limits confidence.
04 · VERIFY
Check the evidence.
Every claim links to its source and timestamp, so you can confirm it without trusting us.
scan · one chain
Candidates412
Eligible38
0x9a31…c0deingested21:14:02
0x41bd…77a0ingested21:14:02
0xe20f…19c3partial21:14:03
0x07ac…5d1eingested21:14:03
0xbb64…f2a9excluded: age21:14:04
Volume momentum
88
Active-wallet growth
71
Transaction momentum
69
Holder growth
—
Liquidity context
42
Emergence
81
SCORE 73 · CONFIDENCE 85% · attention-v1
This token entered the radar because volume, active wallets and transactions rose in the 24h window.Reported liquidity is limited and the contract source is not verified.Holder count is not available from the provider.! Concentrated holders! Source not verifiedHolders: unknown
Market data provider A · volume, trades
21:14 UTC
Contract metadata provider B · verified source: no
21:12 UTC
Pool and liquidity proxy provider A · provider-specific
21:14 UTC
Score formula attention-v1 · weights published
versioned
The feed
Attention and context, side by side.
Explore a sample feed. Attention and review signals stay visible together.
Volume and wallet growth lead. Liquidity supports activity.
Data complete
Attention score 81
02
Sample Two TWO
Base · 0x2222…bbbb
Confidence 100% · attention-v1
Volume is high relative to reported liquidity.
! Volume vs liquidity
Attention score 74
03
Sample Three THREE
Base · 0x3333…cccc
Confidence 85% · attention-v1
Transactions rising. Holder growth is not available.
Holder growth: unknown
Attention score 69
04
Sample Four FOUR
Base · 0x4444…dddd
Confidence 80% · attention-v1
New token. Limited history lowers confidence.
! Limited history
Attention score 63
05
Sample Five FIVE
Base · 0x5555…eeee
Confidence 100% · attention-v1
Observed activity is concentrated in few addresses.
! Concentrated activity
Attention score 58
Source: local design fixtures · prepared 15 October 2026, 21:14 UTC. Scores illustrate the 0–100 attention scale; confidence illustrates feature coverage. These are fictional candidates.
—
Sample Six SIX
0x6666…ffff
Found, but not enough reliable data to rank it. Market data is 3 hours old.
Not ranked
The report
Why is this token on the radar?
The top of every report answers that, then shows what weakens the answer. Switch the window and watch the evidence change.
1
Generated from signalsThe sentence is built from the top measured contributors, never from a token's name.
2
Visible mathSix components, six weights, one score. Change the window and the score recomputes.
3
Flags, not verdictsThings to inspect. Not proof of wrongdoing and not a safety score.
4
Honest gapsMissing data is named and lowers confidence.
Sample report · illustrative values
Example Token EXM · Base · 0x1234…abcd
Attention score
73
Confidence85%attention-v1
Why trending
Attention score 73 in the 24h window. Main contributors: volume momentum 88, active-wallet growth 71, transaction momentum 69. Holder growth is not available.
Volume momentum
88
Transaction momentum
69
Active-wallet growth
71
Holder growth
Not available
Liquidity context
42
Emergence
81
Context flags
! Concentrated holders! Source not verified! Limited liquidityHolder growth: not available
Sources and limitations
Source: local design fixture · prepared 15 October 2026, 21:14 UTC. Values illustrate normalized activity features on a 0–100 scale; they are not market observations. Confidence shows available feature weight. Holder growth is excluded and weights are renormalized.